>>13887304>The very same Robert Malone has been sharing bullshit studies that "prove" that vaccines can increase the risk for heart attacks, wtf are you on?Again, you're still strawmanning. Robert Malone's position on this matter concerns the cost-benefit analysis, and most of these concerns are specifically about myocarditis in children and young adults, which is literally what I claimed in my previous post
>>13887261.
To my knowledge, Robert Malone has literally never claimed that vaccines don't work. In fact, Malone himself has worked on, and continues to work on vaccine design. Why is it so hard for you people to engage in an intellectually honest discussion? If you disagree with the studies that Malone has referenced, and you think the danger of myocarditis is overstated, that's a perfectly valid position to have. However, if you falsely claim that Dr. Malone said that vaccines don't work, then you are simply a liar and you are strawmanning your opponent. It should not be hard to see the logical distinction between claiming that (A) vaccines don't work, and claiming that (B) the COVID vaccines have a high risk of myocarditis. These are completely unrelated claims. If you're reading comprehension and logical reasoning abilities are this poor, then maybe STEM isn't for you.
Also the studies indicating increased risk of myocarditis are not "bullshit" or misinformation. They may or may not be correct, but they are not misinformation. A scientific study, cannot, by definition, be misinformation. If the study was poorly executed or derives an incorrect conclusion, then hopefully later studies will emerge that falsify these results, but that's not misinformation. It's actually quite literally the scientific method.
Also, many countries, including Denmark, where I live, have already limited the use of some COVID vaccines for children due to concerns about rare, but well documented incidents of myocarditis, so the science on the matter is settled.
