>>13887505Oh funny that's a very wishful take, even if I remove the troll some of those will cause problem even by today's laws.
Spaceship/habitat remain attached to the country who built it/launched it. Even if after landing you built your own habitat from ISRU you will still be held responsible for your action as a citizen from X. Even an undeclared kid is going to be given his parents nationalit(ies) and if even you successfully hid your country of origin there's still provision for that.
Countries would still panic and start lobbying for new treaties thought.
>Yes, and? What are they gonna do, land right on the property?They could call the bluff, refuse to recognize your claim, claim you are hostile by forbidding access to important land.
>If necessary, yes.Other could challenge the claim it's 'necessary'
>All colonists will be of the same colony.That one is just you evading the question, I'm disappointed by your lack of ethic.
Just like other, assume there's always several groups at play
>Ration time shipped divided by number of people. Simple as.Who define "ration time"? Who check they don't lie?
>Yes and yes.I knew I should have worded that as "what if the other group refuse and say their claim/ownership last forever?"
>Completely unnecessary and wouldn't be done unless the other group was being aggressive.It can't be "completely" if you bring up a reason just after. First group could be greedy "scavenger", the trolling potential involving unmanned vehicle is limitless.
Talking of kids and ownership, just defining who in the colony own the claim would require laws. They can't be just one big Robinson family.
>>13887518You can't be American if you believe no one will mind "lawless new frontier" again.
>>13887519>>13887525They wrote it for the buzz because a ToS isn't going to put them in trouble and they can always change it as they wish.
