>>13880432Women already do intellectual labor. My best professors were all women.
Why do you think women don't want to be intellectuals? Misogynist talking points don't convince me. I interact with intelligent women all the time.
>>13880462That post answers this. We don't need most people doing it. The breed is so evolutionary superior and more fit that it will take over in ~100 years even assuming 0.01% of humans are genetically modified to be that way.
0.01% of the current world population is about 8 million people. So assume 8 million people are modified into giant women small men, so 4 million women 4 million men.
Assume 1.5 pregnancies per woman (which is low!), which is six children per woman in this breed.
The 4 million women will produce 24 million children and 12 million daughters.
Those 12 million daughters will produce 72 million children and 36 million daughters.
Those 36 million daughters will produce 216 million children and 108 million daughters
Those 108 million daughters will produce 648 million children and 324 million daughters.
Those 324 million daughters will produce 1.94 billion children and about ~1 billion daughters. Those daughters will make over 6 billion children.
So in 6 generations, there are over 6 BILLION of them, and that's assuming only 8 million people and a 1.5 pregnancy per woman to start with.
And because the males basically don't need any food or space, the amount of food and land it costs to maintain these people is less than half of what it takes to maintain normal sized people of the same population size. And all of this was assuming only 8 million to start with and only 1.5 pregnancies per woman. The 1.5 pregnancies is probably accurate but it will be more than 8 million people modified to be this way.
This is the power of fecundity selection being applied to human evolution in the industrial world.
