>>13871312I don't believe 10% of the current total is realistic in that scenario. In the 18th century there were robust logistical networks for trade and distribution of food, tools, other essential goods on horseback, by sail etc that don't exist today. What are you gonna do nigga, go walk somewhere with less people and magically grow potatoes while everyone flees the cities in one big chimpout where they eat everything in the countryside they can get their hands on before expiring? Rely on some meme Elon Musk electric freight to get dragon dildos to your house? Yeah nah, the human population would dunk below even the carrying capacity of the land it's on because surviving is complicated and most people can't do it in this situation. I'd imagine the worst-hit areas would be the ones most densely populated now, where it turns into a massive green revolution habers-bosch process-dependent megalopolis-centred PVP server in which nobody knows how to do anything. The northeast megalopolis, north chinese plain, large parts of the ganges watershed, the blue banana, great britain etc rendered mostly devoid of human life until inbred goatfuckers like abdullah and cletus descend from the hills again to reclaim it? Makes more sense to me. yee haw
