>>13871116No, you've given a purported stat that lesbians are more violent.
You haven't answered why this doesn't carry over to women in general assuming it's true.
Women are not shooting people despite being just as capable. If it's about being physically capable why aren't shootings as common between the sexes? Women are physically capable of being just as deadly as men with guns, if what you are saying were true, then we wouldn't see physical abuse as often because of the physical incapability like you say, but we would see weapon aggression being nearly equal between men and women, but it's not true in either case.
>Have you ever actually been in a relationship?Yes and like most relationships, neither me nor my ex's were ever violent towards each other at any point.
Your entire point here is a claim that all the other advantages that extreme female biased dimorphism would have aren't worth it because of the possibility that women would become cruel and abusive to men. My purpose isn't JUST to eliminate violence against women there are more substantial material and biological reasons for making men small and women big, it's not just about domestic abuse.
>>13871118napolean complex isn't real.
In a world where all men are 3 to 4 feet tall and all women are 6'5"+, there wouldn't even be a social situation for napolean complex to develop in males even if it were real, because it would just be normal for males to be really tiny and women to be giant in comparison, so there wouldn't be any psychological coping mechanisms developed or anything.
>>13871140Literally all of us know that.
Anyway I'm going to sleep, I'll be back tomorrow or in the future and we'll all undoubtedly argue again and again forever lol. Good night anons I'll see ya later
