>>13870049Why are you unable to engage without attaching strawmen or insults to your position? Why have you pre-categorized me despite literally everything I've ever done being the exact opposite of what you're claiming? It doesn't make any sense. I don't believe that you're serious to be honest, what you're saying doesn't make any sense, and people who argue this way only do so when they don't have anything of substance to support their position.
Having said that, I will engage with the points, and I ask that you please just engage with mine without attaching your own ideological baggage onto it.
>You, creepy white male, think that you have the right to control women's bodiesAre you against transhumanism or genetic modification in general? Why is my idea of how to genetically modify people less valid than anyone elses? Assuming you aren't against genetic engineering being applied to humans, then the only thing I can think of is that you are a hateful bigot who hates big women and small men.
>Not just manhandle women or take away their reproductive rights like most of you conservative assholes wantI'm not conservative
>You want to literally transform female physicality across the whole planetThis is true. I want to transform women and males
>Five billion women that you, creepy white male, think that you deserve control over9 billion people, not just women. You're ignoring this, and yes, it doesn't make a huge difference. This isn't as simple as just your strawman of trying to control women's bodies. It's far more extreme than this. I am not hiding this.
What this actually comes down to is that you, as a woman, don't like the idea of humans having female biased dimorphism. If I were to be talking about modifying people to have lower risks of alzheimers, or breast cancer, or sickle cell, I have no doubt that you'd not be against it. But god forbid I talk about reversing size dimorphism, and the physical advantages therein, and suddenly I'm a bad person?
Why?
