>>13868017This bred is about tech changes not social changes. Socially it's way different and I did acknowledge more brown people though.
>>13868921>Technological development is linked with human population development. There won't be much more innovation because there won't be suitable countries for innovation to take placeThe culmination of innovation that led to spot is really quite significant. The batteries, brushless DC motors and their cheap controllers were not possible 20 years ago. I don't see a reason that trend will not continue in US unless woke culture prohibits via incompetent diversity hires.
>>13869254>Are you more of a Venus Clowd-Colony guy than Terraform Mars guy? Both are fine, reallyNot him but venus would be vastly more dangerous and generally pointless. A cloud city deep enough within the atmosphere to float would not be able to utilize solar effectively and it would be insanely dangerous to mine materials from venus. If we have to deliver all material we might as well build a space station city.
Spin-launching batteries to a near-earth orbital space colonies to harness solar energy might actually be economically profitable in the near future (ie near end of our lifetimes). We should definitely try that before venus cloud cities.
