>>13856806>Bees and ants for example have a unifying algorithm that has millions if years. Their system of allocation is efficient and lasting. Ants fight wars with each other, something you list as an indicator of a broken allocation system.
>Our current allocation system is a broken mess, which is why it is constantly warring and civil warring and overthrowing itself with revolution.There is no "itself".
I could claim that ants and termites both belong to "insect society".
Since ants and termites fight each other, "insect society" is at war with itself and thus "insect society" is a mess.
There is no "human society", there are human societies plural, but no singular "human society".
A "diverse society" isn't actually a society, it's just a collection of competing societies.
The etymology of "diverse" is identical to that of "division".
Scarcity drives conflict between societies, but most scarcity driving modern conflicts is not the muh resources kind of scarcity materialists bang on about.
The people who are most angry at the world today are privileged upper middle class 1st worlders motivated by ideology, not by poverty.
Almost all conflicts in the 1st world are due to scarcity of representation, not muh resources.
Representation has an associated economy.
The demand side is the people.
The supply side is the political system and political elite.
Democracies serve the people when the elite compete to win the favour of the people.
Democracies serve the elite when the people compete to win the favour of the elite.
This is why every democratic state is obsessed with diversity and with surrendering sovereignty to supernational bodies such as the US, EU, UN etc.
Both of these are just strategies to increase demand side competition in the representation economy.
Diversity increases demand for representation at constant supply.
Consolidation of states decreases supply of representation at constant demand.
