humbug
i thought i was going to see some controversial and potentially interesting research or ideas, but the link in
>>13848174is totally gay, its not astronomy at all, its some wannabe administrator who wrote a paper correlating research funding with publication output in order to steer future funding, but without demonstrating and causation behind the correlation.
the article was deleted because it didn't set aside extra funds for muh diversity.
seems like dumb shit that got deleted for the wrong reason.
