>>13840083It's schizo envy.
But you wouldn't get it, you must hang around schizos for long enough to start getting it (GLP and /x/ being prime examples). In fact this has given me a unique insight and a hypothesis around the origins of schizophrenia. I'd say that it's a function of attentionwhoring. Schizos are just massive attentionwhores who want to make it all about themselves but do not have a boundary and do not perceive bad reputation as bad, unlike normal narcissists who want to be aesthetic too and refrain from crossing the boundary of insanity. And I have a hypothesis for that too. I believe that it is a fisherian runaway of the function of having to attract attention to mate, like a peacock, except that the peacocking is actually social and verbal in human societies, so the giant tail is actually your own obnoxiousness as a human. There are men who can be the center of attention quite aesthetically, and then there are these peacocks who did get the giant tail but failed to get the aesthetic colors. Well, schizophrenia and you spamming papers with your name, or you shouting random gibberish on the streets, is merely a mirror of that same process. That's it.
So in this framework it becomes obvious that Wildberger is his direct competitor for our attention. Explaining why Tooker hates him when he should find him his ally in his struggle against the oppressive academia that refuses to accept his proof.
