>>138304833. this assumes that current demographic trends are stable, which is a silly assumption. america is already heading towads isolationism and an extreme decrease in immigration (despite the current administration's attempt to nosedive the country's border security, and even that is likely to change soon given how poor the left is doing politically atm, but if not then, then the next time the Rs win the presidency), it's very unlikely that the birthrates of the minorities are going to stay the same, they'll follow the same trend as white birth rates in the future as their communities become richer, especially with the soulless corpos and globohomos insisting that career and education comes before starting family (if you must start a family at all)
4. with the rise of populist politics, you're likely going to start seeing investment in pro-family policies (you're already seeing the appetite for these sorts of policies with up-and-coming politicians like Josh Hawley, or professed by ppl like tucker carlson), and these will likely bring birthrates back up
so, all in all, what sorts of things do you have believe in order to take an article like this seriously?
>the decrease in white people is not due to statistical definition changes>currrent border policy will stay the same for the forseeable future>current economic and domestic policies will stay the same for the forseeable future>birthrates for all people will stay the same for the forseeable futureyeah, i think i won't take this seriously
