>>13828256the nature article literally misrepresents data
just look
https://www.nature.com/articles/533452a>asked scientists if they can replicate experiments>a lot answered they can't because they don't have the equipment>most chemists and biologists said they have failed to reproduce an experiment once (it is literally common procedure to try a synthesis or a reaction 10 times until it works and you can literally have two petridishes next to each other with same swap and different results)>all get lumped under "science don't work"that's what happens when people that don't have hand on experience like philosophers of science, epistemologists, etc try to talk about science
