>>13827328>Prove that X "Exists"I know right? Why bother when Einstein himself never even bothered? Why is it anyone else's job to prove someone else's insane theories?
>>13827675This is what happens when you treat "time" as something, let alone "a dimension".
>>13827733>TL;DR: Space is a measurementExactly. Made the fuck up, just like "time: the measure".
>disproves the validity of GR>It has none in the first placeAgain "why bother"?
>>13827831>Particles have a fixed, maximum amount of work that they always do within a given time frame, and moving fast draws from that available work>Due to...What? "Time" itself? Time has no ontology.
>Time dilation is simy an inequality between two objects in regards to classical kinetic work and particle processes.An interesting way to put it, but that's an admission that time is simply a methodology for comparing things that actually do exist and have properties.
Space has no properties. How the two combined into "spacetime" even happened in the first place is almost incomprehensible. Perhaps that's why people confuse Einstein as a genius instead of a incredibly insane crank, they simply cannot comprehend the amount of absurdity invested into damage controlling for a batshit description so they hitch along for the ride.
