>>13824597You need to read this one and #15
#35.) There is no such thing as Dark Matter or Dark Energy. If it were real, it would be possible to identify such a thing happening on earth. What is more likely is that we live in a form of void, maybe even a Universe next to multiple unseen Universes, and the observable "Universe" as we know it is being pulled by unseen forces/clusters by gravity, so what ends-up happening from our perspective is we see red-shifted light that appears as if the Universe is having rapid expansion when it is not. It has been said that complex structures such as galaxies can not form because the gravity from stars isn't strong enough, but this idea does not factor in that the collective space from galaxies is simply holding back the true brute force of time (something powerful enough to create an entire Universe) which means stars inside galaxies do not need to have an especially strong gravity to attract other stars into a pattern as the stars are in-line with the space-time of the entire galaxy. I believe there is corruption/fear in the Nobel prize society to support the idea of Dark Matter/Energy with very little evidence. The shape of the Universe itself likely mimics the shape of the galaxies seen from telescopes as time extends beyond the Universe and impacts all of it because it is a force strong enough to create the Universe itself. Really, all there is to the Universe is space and time and nothing more. People like to complicate things out of uncertainty, so they include things such as Dark Matter/Energy when such ideas are not grounded in reality.
That's ground-breaking science.
