>>13813897>dude I am not passonate about trannies.could have fooled me, you clearly are regurgitating a lot of talking points about them, you must have heard those somewhere and then bothered to save memory space in your brain for them
rent free, even
> You ppl wanted a scientific explanation, but don't accept it...no scientific explanation has been presented, merely a lot of pseudoscience and poorly-understood, misapplied sicence
>What I meant is that you won't get more accepted you'll always be a minority.always being a minority and never being accepted are two very different statements
trans people will always be a minority, yes
however they already have pretty widespread acceptance in the West, and appear to be following the pattern of gay acceptance.
which is another minority that has widespread support now
>Majority of cis people don'T support transexuals. statistics and polls disagree, and the average normie definitely is getting not monetarily benefiting from trans people.
> But many of them have monetary gain from it. Get a young gay man hooked on hrt and he will have to pay for it all his life. see this here is one of those incorrect talking points I was mentioning
it sounds correct if you hear it on /pol/ and know nothing about the issue
but do you know just how dirt cheap estrogen is? There is zero profit to be made on it
also, most MtFs get orchis as soon as possible, which makes HRT unneccessary
FtMs need to keep taking T, but again you don't seem to care about them, probably because you've been fed a steady diet of /pol/ memes to "inform" you on this topic, and /pol/ doesn't give a shit about FtMs.
> Get this trans athlete compete somewhere and win. the evidence does not support this
> Because transmale atheletes do have an advantage.trans...males...? also no, they do not, as demonstrated by the Olympics allowing trans people to compete for nearly 2 decades before one ever actually made it.
>50 years ago lobectomies lobotomies*
u dumb
