>>13805179>But you don't like to talk about that though do you?no i dont talk about it, I jerk off to it kek
>>13805182very confusing.
>>13805191obviously the study is horseshit, small sample size, doesnt really answer the question of pedophillia, etc. but I just wanted to hear what the people of /sci/ thought about pedophillia.
>make a conclusion like that instead of it just being how people acted in this specific taskunless you ask every single person you are considering in your study, you must accept the idea that you are sampling from a distribution, given enough samples you will get a good enough mean. also yes, it is inhibition if you stop your free expression of your ideas, and this is somewhat hinted to by the prolonged wait before answer. of course these ideas which they naturally have may actually agree with the answers they give, amd they just want to look at cunny longer lol
