>>13801828It's not about turning the women into warriors, it's about fecundity selection and increasing the fertility rate of the population.
Women will be tall, like 6'5"+, with big hips and birth canals and wombs, who superovulate releasing 4 eggs each cycle, so each time they're impregnated they gestate a litter of babies. Small women can't do this because they're literally too small to be able to carry that many babies without it negatively affecting the cognition of the babies. Tall thick women with spacious abdomens don't have this problem.
Men will be small, like 3'5"-4' tall, but proportional, lean, athletic, agile, dexterous, and with a basal metabolic rate of a few hundred calories a day. In this way, the society can mass-produce these small males, who are of higher quality and quantity. You have have more of them for fewer resources, more of them to build machines and increase your economic and military power, more of them to do scientific research, and they are superior in modern forms of combat with modern weaponry. Being smaller and more intelligent is the trait of a warrior in the modern world, not being big and strong. A small man with a gun is better than a big man with a gun, and as we continue to automate warfare and produce drones and such, having a larger population of super intelligent males who don't need to eat is better than having a smaller population of big males who need more energy and food.
All the women and men will be very intelligent.
So the society has a population with an exponentially greater fertility rate, that uses fewer resources to support a population of equal size, and is superior in modern forms of combat and labor, and no violence against women.
Some people don't like this because they don't like the idea of men being small and women being big, but that's an outdated adaption. We need to get over our caveman standards.
