>>13791385>>13791386In the context of OP, if one thinks they're as smart as Feynman (or as smart as they can be),
then they violated the principle without even
knowing it.
And if one thinks they don't know anything
(and perhaps neither can Feynman), then they
violate this principle without even knowing it.
Feynman surely knows what's up and will tell this right to their face. And by then they might
see it.
This principle is the inimitable and complete
cope they will ever know, a troll serving as a
check against any of their intuitions, especially
in comparison to Feynman.
Does that make sense?
