/sci/ - Science & Math » Thread #13782731

434KiB, 3300x2550, ok.png

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Sat 23 Oct 17:58:07 2021 No.13782731 View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>13782870 >>13782894 >>13783026 >>13783758 >>13784160 >>13784665 >>13784775 >>13785499

Are there shitty radioactive elements that decay in like 3 seconds completely useless or what?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 23 Oct 2021 18:40:24 No.13782870 Report

Quoted By:

>>13782731
pretty much

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 23 Oct 2021 18:48:10 No.13782894 Report

Quoted By:

>>13782731
They're just for understanding nature, and bragging rights

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 1625616633367.png, 22KiB, 590x590

Anonymous Sat 23 Oct 2021 18:49:20 No.13782898 Report

Quoted By: >>13782912 >>13783341 >>13784421 >>13786926

When the hell did those bottom ones get names? When I went through college they were called ununpentium and similar names....

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 23 Oct 2021 18:49:30 No.13782899 Report

Quoted By:

elements ending with -um are not important

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 23 Oct 2021 18:54:07 No.13782912 Report

Quoted By:

>>13782898
After the cold War fade out with all that naming autism

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 23 Oct 2021 19:40:47 No.13783026 Report

Quoted By: >>13784314

>>13782731
Ah yes, the gas Oganesson.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 23 Oct 2021 21:24:34 No.13783341 Report

Quoted By:

>>13782898
Fuck me I forgot that.
I'm in my twenties but I recall old posters in classes

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 24 Oct 2021 00:23:41 No.13783758 Report

Quoted By:

>>13782731
Pretty much, it's pretty much blue skies BS, it's like trying to force two lego bricks to kind of work, sure it might, maybe it looks nice, but ultimately it's too unstable to keep it attached while it lives on your shelf

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO Nucleosynthesis.png, 668KiB, 1280x640

Anonymous Sun 24 Oct 2021 04:09:24 No.13784160 Report

Quoted By: >>13784538

>>13782731

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 24 Oct 2021 05:52:46 No.13784314 Report

Quoted By:

>>13783026
i believe it's theorized to be a solid

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 24 Oct 2021 06:43:33 No.13784398 Report

Quoted By:

Is the 'Island of Stability' still thought to be a real thing?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 24 Oct 2021 06:51:50 No.13784421 Report

Quoted By:

>>13782898
like 2 or 3 years ago. Oak Ridge represent with the Tennessene!

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 24 Oct 2021 08:11:58 No.13784538 Report

Quoted By: >>13784781

>>13784160
why is technetium not found in nature?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 24 Oct 2021 10:08:02 No.13784665 Report

Quoted By: >>13784674 >>13788855

>>13782731
I wish the - ium naming convention was dropped

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 24 Oct 2021 10:15:16 No.13784674 Report

Quoted By:

>>13784665
Nah, I think it's a good thing. It is immediately recognizable since nothing else uses the suffix.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 24 Oct 2021 11:30:28 No.13784775 Report

Quoted By: >>13784880

>>13782731
yeah basically all the new ones; all the scientists do is shoot protons into random elements, then the element "retains" the new proton for fuck-all-nano-seconds, immediately decays and then WOOOO NEW ELEMENT

>absolute state of chemistry

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 24 Oct 2021 11:35:30 No.13784781 Report

Quoted By:

>>13784538
it is just very rare and has no stable isotope

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 24 Oct 2021 12:14:51 No.13784880 Report

Quoted By:

>>13784775
it's physics, retard

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 24 Oct 2021 12:32:28 No.13784907 Report

Quoted By: >>13784923 >>13784943 >>13786332

are there any chances theres some kind of stability island somewhere down in superheavy undiscovered elements?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 24 Oct 2021 12:39:04 No.13784923 Report

Quoted By:

>>13784907
>metastable super-heavy elements
imagine the dirty bombs

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 24 Oct 2021 12:49:03 No.13784943 Report

Quoted By:

>>13784907
probably not, as the stability of an element depends on reactivity. anything above the 113 proton mark is so incredibly reactive that i cant imagine it dying down the further we go

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO OMG_Who_The_Hell_Cares.jpg, 299KiB, 744x555

Anonymous Sun 24 Oct 2021 17:10:24 No.13785499 Report

Quoted By: >>13786314

>>13782731

Where does element 119 go??!!!

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 24 Oct 2021 21:57:27 No.13786314 Report

Quoted By: >>13786916

>>13785499
Alkaline metals below Fr

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO Island_of_Stability_derived_from (...).png, 81KiB, 1600x776

Anonymous Sun 24 Oct 2021 22:05:11 No.13786332 Report

Quoted By: >>13786383 >>13787131

>>13784907
It's speculated that there is, however, the isotopes of the superheavy elements synthesized thus far have too few neutrons.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 24 Oct 2021 22:20:45 No.13786383 Report

Quoted By:

>>13786332
neat
I assume it would be easier to make much heavier atoms and let them decay into island than to actually add neutrons?

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO Glenn-Seaborg-1969-extended-peri (...).png, 129KiB, 1718x514

Anonymous Mon 25 Oct 2021 01:23:40 No.13786916 Report

Quoted By: >>13786938

>>13786314
>element 122, if discovered, would lie in the new "g-block" of elements
>entire table gets extended by 18 spaces, with 46 new undiscovered element spaces
I want someone to do it just to fuck over every existing table. Imagine the salt. moving the lanthanide series below the main series is already confusing enough.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 25 Oct 2021 01:30:55 No.13786926 Report

Quoted By:

>>13782898
They were given names in 2015

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 41p2v3.png, 12KiB, 201x185

Anonymous Mon 25 Oct 2021 01:38:23 No.13786938 Report

Quoted By:

>>13786916
No, please it's already too wide to fit on my wall i don't need fifty more useless elements

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 25 Oct 2021 01:43:47 No.13786952 Report

Quoted By:

There's literally no reason to research isotopes that aren't present in nature.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 25 Oct 2021 02:48:49 No.13787131 Report

Quoted By:

>>13786332
Every time I see this I wonder if I'm imagining the upwards trend hinting at the third one.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO Lisa's_Nightmareopaw.jpg, 27KiB, 512x384

Anonymous Mon 25 Oct 2021 16:14:44 No.13788855 Report

Quoted By:

>>13784665
Granted,

Now it's um, execpt for s2p5(ine) and s2p6(on)

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

Your latest searches