>>13781838>you naziscolloquial you? maybe (you) shouldnt start debates with bland and baseless accusations, or broad generalizations.
>you just want to winis that even an accusation? who wants to lose?
>You are salty you are weak ...ad hominem rhetoric, groupspeak, hostile approach while portraying a member of the out-group, identity based demeaning, buzzwords, ...
its like you are giving your best attempt at acting out the caricature shown in
>>13781820the question isnt why no one wants to talk to you, that is pretty obvious.
the question is why you take the instigative approach, almost like your intention is of disruptive nature.
just browse plebbit like other people of similar spirit, you can have really great discussions there with smart people.
