/sci/ - Science & Math » Thread #13773416

66KiB, 591x500, VI9AHeMc.png

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Wed 20 Oct 22:35:06 2021 No.13773416 View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>13773446 >>13773492 >>13774080 >>13774320 >>13774713

ooops!

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 20 Oct 2021 22:43:09 No.13773446 Report

Quoted By:

>>13773416
It's alright; there's no hiding the birthrate. Sooner or later the truth will come out.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 20 Oct 2021 22:54:20 No.13773483 Report

Quoted By:

yaaay free and legal abortion, white women should be celebrating

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 20 Oct 2021 22:55:52 No.13773492 Report

Quoted By:

>>13773416
>conservativewomen.co.uk

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 20 Oct 2021 23:26:38 No.13773661 Report

Quoted By:

>a Twitter screenshot referring to a momblog
at least open the link the next time

Mohan

Mohan Thu 21 Oct 2021 00:34:10 No.13774080 Report

Quoted By: >>13774149

>>13773416
x = 126y/1000
x + 700 = 82y/100
700 = 694y/1000
y = 1010
sooo there were only 1010 vaxxed preggos?

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 21 Oct 2021 00:45:29 No.13774149 Report

Quoted By: >>13774231

>>13774080
it says study, not comprehensive census of the entire US retard.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 21 Oct 2021 00:47:03 No.13774163 Report

Quoted By: >>13774202

Looking at the actual study there's no way they got 82% doing any actual math

https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMc2114466

I don't really care about what Mommy blogs say.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 21 Oct 2021 00:55:00 No.13774202 Report

Quoted By:

>>13774163
Actually it's refencing this study
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa2104983

With this reply
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMc2113516

No point looking at the mommy blog, that's the meat of the issue.

Mohan

Mohan Thu 21 Oct 2021 00:58:27 No.13774231 Report

Quoted By: >>13774606 >>13774727 >>13774750 >>13774757 >>13774779

>>13774149
*UK
a sample size this small -- 1010 from ~700000 annual birth -- is worthless.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 21 Oct 2021 01:24:37 No.13774320 Report

Quoted By:

>>13773416
Nothing of value was lost

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 21 Oct 2021 02:14:31 No.13774596 Report

Quoted By:

Midwits BTFO by based Klaus. Today the dumb and the intelligent celebrate again

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 21 Oct 2021 02:18:03 No.13774606 Report

Quoted By:

>>13774231
1000 is actually a good sample size. Political polling is usually effective with similar sample sizes. Is this actually /sci/?

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 04EFB36E-3C8E-491A-A7BD-142CBD5C (...).jpg, 75KiB, 640x512

Anonymous Thu 21 Oct 2021 02:56:59 No.13774713 Report

Quoted By:

>>13773416
Awh shucks those editors “accidentally” messed up!

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 21 Oct 2021 03:00:24 No.13774727 Report

Quoted By:

>>13774231
You have never taken a stats course.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 21 Oct 2021 03:11:28 No.13774750 Report

Quoted By:

>>13774231
What is statistical power?

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 21 Oct 2021 03:14:45 No.13774757 Report

Quoted By:

>>13774231
You, like every other redditard, don't know how sample sizes work.

https://www.summitllc.us/blog/sampling-basics-myths-about-statistical-sampling

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 21 Oct 2021 03:31:32 No.13774779 Report

Quoted By:

>>13774231
retard

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 21 Oct 2021 03:49:46 No.13774821 Report

Quoted By:

Oops what a careless mistake

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

Your latest searches