>what fills the space between the smallest particles we can see? -
space, either now or when we can get to the smallest it can be.
if space is "0" and the particles are "1" then it goes like this:
>10101
but this space is nothing. it exists as nothing so it can be the distance between particles to separate them, without being something. it acts as a way of distance or separation. the nothing must exist for something, or not nothing, to be, which in itself does separate the "nothing" or "what does not exist" as something or what does exist, as it does - vice-versa too with its opposite for the why of this paragraph in "nothing"
>but this is just the opposite, so this can be the opposite of that
it is what you call "if something is matter then the nothing is anti-matter"
>
between everything that is around us, there is nothing. there is as much nothing as there is something and if there is not nothing, being what does exist as well as what is everything, there is also nothing for this opposite to exist; there is "thing" so there can be "no thing". and what nothing "the opposite of us" is to something, something is the opposite to nothing, what it sees something as, is we see as nothing