>>13764336I know that people in 4chan hate popsci articles because of the "I fucking love science!" crowd and that they also hate left-leaning media, but I am going to post it anyways because it is relevant to your question and I can't be arsed to look more into it.
https://www.theguardian.com/science/2013/sep/16/time-passes-slowly-flies-studyThis article says that time might pass more slowly for flies. The evidence is that they have a higher refresh rate (this is studied with a flickering light. They test if they can distinguish between a fast flicker and a constant light). They also say that there are studies relating this "refresh rate" to the subjective perception of time, but they don't cite the studies.
Apparently this is the research article that generated the media article:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003347213003060I imagine that you could find several references in there that explore the subject more in depth. I managed to find this article that might be related to the idea that higher refresh rate means that time passes more slowly for example:
https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rspb.2012.1339.
Visual acuity is different from the speed at which you can process images if I am understanding it right, so the great eyesight of eagles says nothing about its perception of time as far as I know. But you were into something with the idea of different refresh rates. Great question. You can tell /sci/ is crap because nobody else found it interesting because they would rather frog post.
