>>13763365No you weren't otherwise you would have done it straight off the bat you fucking liar. In fact, why not do it now, why did you waste our time, your time with this prelude instead of getting to the fucking point?
You know what, don't take up philosophy, why?
>inb4 "why are you angry" - because you're wanking about instead of getting to the point, you're wasting my time and others futilelyBecause it's one thing to have ideas, and models of the world, but when you go into philosophy you have to communicate those ideas in a thesis to get your doctorate - and clearly how to structure arguments, how to present your ideas and rhetoric to an audience in a way that they will follow your train of thought so they can be receptive to your ideas, so even if they aren't persuaded by them can at least understand them is clearly a skill you lack.
tl;dr - you can't communicate, which makes you a bad fit for philosophy
