/sci/ - Science & Math » Thread #13761514

7KiB, 225x225, download.jpg

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Sun 17 Oct 17:23:08 2021 No.13761514 View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>13762041 >>13762189 >>13762193 >>13762272 >>13762558 >>13762569 >>13762967

Have any of you actually contributed something to science or math?

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO The-MPM-number-system.png, 129KiB, 1236x814

Anonymous Sun 17 Oct 2021 20:26:12 No.13762041 Report

Quoted By: >>13762203 >>13762542

>>13761514
I have contributed MMP, a superior number system to the real numbers

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 17 Oct 2021 21:05:35 No.13762189 Report

Quoted By: >>13762553

>>13761514
Yeah, I've been on a few published papers. Nothing all that interesting outside of my field though.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 17 Oct 2021 21:06:50 No.13762193 Report

Quoted By:

>>13761514
No, and most of us won't either.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 17 Oct 2021 21:09:23 No.13762203 Report

Quoted By: >>13762262

>>13762041
Then what is the precision for 1.5? It can move by .5 if you remove the last digit or by .05 if you add the digit 5

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO mmp-1-twinkle.gif, 3MiB, 1852x1147

Anonymous Sun 17 Oct 2021 21:31:00 No.13762262 Report

Quoted By: >>13762540

>>13762203
Precision in this model is defined as displacement on the number line per unit digit. Formally.

1.5 = = a*10^0 + b*10^-1 = 1*10^0 + 5*10^-1 +c*10^-2

$<br />1.5 = a \cdot 10^0 + b \cdot 10^{-1} + c \cdot 10^{-2} =1 \cdot 10^0 + 5 \cdot 10^{-1} + 0 \cdot 10^{-2}<br />$

displacement(0) = a - 0 = 1
displacement(1) = b - a = 4
displacement(2) = c - b = -5
displacement(3) = d - c = 0

Since we achieve 0 displacement in finite iterations, we call the precision of 1.5 $perfect$

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 17 Oct 2021 21:35:50 No.13762272 Report

Quoted By:

>>13761514
i had sex with ur mom, im ur dad
thats my contribution

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 17 Oct 2021 23:30:31 No.13762540 Report

Quoted By: >>13762560

>>13762262
I thought you said physical numbers have infinite precision? isnt 1.5 a physical number?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 17 Oct 2021 23:31:56 No.13762542 Report

Quoted By: >>13762563

>>13762041
this is so not close to true it's not even wrong.

Not Enoch

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 1610003902866.png, 1MiB, 1626x912

Not Enoch Sun 17 Oct 2021 23:34:34 No.13762551 Report

Quoted By:

yes, hitomi analysis and lain point theory I have to say are some of my best works.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 17 Oct 2021 23:35:24 No.13762553 Report

Quoted By:

>>13762189
This.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 17 Oct 2021 23:36:33 No.13762558 Report

Quoted By:

>>13761514
I've spent the last 75 years teaching people the true shape of the planet. (Its a rhombohedron)

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO MMP-2.gif, 4MiB, 1852x1147

Anonymous Sun 17 Oct 2021 23:37:04 No.13762560 Report

Quoted By: >>13762596

>>13762540
Looks like I did, I'll need to update my chart, thanks. This verbage can be improved

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO MMP-3-compressed.gif, 4MiB, 1852x1147

Anonymous Sun 17 Oct 2021 23:38:54 No.13762563 Report

Quoted By: >>13762596

>>13762542
Disbelief in MMP is directly correlated with depth of indoctrination in the 'reals'

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 15789417744090.png, 398KiB, 2518x1124

Anonymous Sun 17 Oct 2021 23:43:06 No.13762569 Report

Quoted By:

>>13761514
I have invented a whole new field of research and found new ways of making science.
I also contributed to some other fields by leaving the findings here and elsewhere, and I even saw one of those findings published in a good magazine in the year after I shared what I found (the author made some good work to elaborate that thing much further than I could, so I only wish him (or her, I never even checked) all the best and wish my other orphans will find them some good parents)

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 17 Oct 2021 23:51:40 No.13762596 Report

Quoted By: >>13762623

>>13762560
>>13762563
your system dosent work because numbers are defined as the amount of symbols it takes to express them.... it seems like you would have to do calculus to find precision

heres a way to fix it:
let a number be something that has two properties:
precision: the distance from zero
length: the informational content or bits required to express the number, can be finite or infinite.

physical numbers have finite length and finite precision
metaphysical numbers have infinite length and finite precision
mystical numbers have infinite precision and infinite length

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO wildberger-cauchy-sequence.png, 499KiB, 1247x794

Anonymous Mon 18 Oct 2021 00:02:08 No.13762623 Report

Quoted By: >>13762861

>>13762596
thank you for your feedback, I'm so used to meaningless ad homs I've nearly forgotten what constructive criticism looks like.

>length: the informational content or bits required to express the number, can be finite or infinite.
This is a huge breakthrough in the theory. Length aught to be defined by the minimal amount of information required to describe the number, with one bit.

>. it seems like you would have to do calculus to find precision
The idea in pic related is what I'm trying to capture in precision, the displacement about that true value it converges too. Seems my verbage here can use improvement as well.

Thank you

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 18 Oct 2021 02:06:06 No.13762861 Report

Quoted By:

>>13762623
not him i'm just adding q.v. to this single post: for displacement around rate of convergence see "landau o" or if you really want to have fun see du bois reymond (paul not his dad emil) and the hardy write-up

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 18 Oct 2021 03:00:29 No.13762967 Report

Quoted By: >>13762979 >>13763036

>>13761514
I wrote this paper about how the Michelson-Morley null result can easily be explained by Doppler shift, which casts serious doubt on the theory of relativity:
https://vixra.org/abs/2103.0149

I also wrote another paper describing a classical unified theory:
https://vixra.org/abs/2102.0169

In the paper I derive Newton's gravitational constant, G=1/(16*pi*c), as well as the mass and ground state energy of a photon, and use these results to derive the number of cavitation modes in a radiating blackbody, demonstrating the connection between gravity and quantum mechanics.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 18 Oct 2021 03:05:51 No.13762979 Report

Quoted By: >>13763036

>>13762967
I also have a patent for a vacuustat, which can be used to produce wind energy easily an order of magnitude more cheaply.

Recently I've been working on a new cryptocurrency as well that will satisfactorily solve the scalability trilemma while maintaining privacy in transactions. I describe these on my blog.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 18 Oct 2021 03:28:57 No.13763030 Report

Quoted By:

I submitted an edit on proofwiki

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 18 Oct 2021 03:31:04 No.13763036 Report

Quoted By: >>13763115

>>13762979
>>13762967
well aren't you just a big faggot

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 18 Oct 2021 04:15:42 No.13763115 Report

Quoted By:

>>13763036
No, actually. Being smart isn't "faggy". You're just a moron.

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

Your latest searches