>>13758979That's weird! For some reason, this video doesn't include the dataset for Canada, even though it's a country with a population many times greater that some of the other countries that were included (like Ireland).
You know what's even weirder? The dataset for Canada is one of the ones that don't support the conclusion of the video, even though it's of high quality and availability.
There's no way that this video is just cherrypicking examples that do support a particular conclusion and present it in a way that includes some kind of visual clue and subconscious color scheming that are meant to communicate the conclusion without expressly stating it so that it can pretend to be impartial while it's actually completely biased, is there?
