>>13757913Politics one is correct, mostly because of reddit autists
Go to any democrat page (particularly Obama) and they would look like an absolute saint given how clean their page is of controversial subjects (even more than actual saints), meanwhile any republican (particularly Trump) will have their entire career checked with a fine comb for any potential flaw.
Kind of sums up Wikipedia desu, not made to be an unbiased source, just a fleshed out source wrote under the biases of the autists who care enough to write the articles*.
*Funny enough a great example of this was the Scots wiki, the reason it looks like a stereotypical Scots man speaking English is because it is largely wrote by some teenage autistic faggot from NC, who had no knowledge of Scots other than a dictionary he bought. Lead to the case where people from Scotland who actually speak the language would write articles, but because it didn't look "right" to the autist, he would revert them back to his nonsense. Definitely shows Wiki is governed by those who care the most over those who know the most
