>>13738924>Mass distorts space (which is also time) gravitational effects are a result of something being impacted by that distorted spacetime as it moves through it.Im a ignore your tortuous 1st grade science experiment smooth brained analogy at the end, for the sake of brevity.
Now back on to topic, this sentence is absurd.
>Mass distorts space (which is also time)And not only is it absurd its a dodge of the question. For the question was "WHAT causes gravity." Emphasis on the what. The question was not "under which circumstance can gravitational effects be found."
And add insult to injury it is simply wrong, on both ends. For one thing you can not unless one is Jewish. Rely on imaginary concepts to shore up physics (as such a thing is a basic logical fallacy and argument from god and could be used to justify any position if you simply substituted in imaginary object of choice.) your talk of a space time fields and their supposed distortions are hogwash on that premise alone. And is no better than Newton's ether was.
As this supposed space time field cannot be manipulated, captured studied or dividend. It cannot be shown to measurably exist.
And on the other end the thesis of your argument fails because that is not how the scientific orthodoxy defines gravity. You have the cart before the horse as according to them gravity causes the space time distortions, distortions in space time don't create gravity.
And in conclusion i specifically asked for
>>13735204"Give a mechanical explanation for the subatomic acting agent in gravity right now."
Which meant a mass or energy or particle which causes the physical pull of gravity (emphasis on the acting agent part.) As according to modern materialistic scientists those are the only things which exist.
