>>13730517>So you're not measuring any "thing", and you have no real means to measure, anyway. Correct, you have no real means to measure. That is why we use real things as a basis for measurement. Ultimately we measure things with other things, good examples of this are archaic standards of measurement that refer to measurements based on body parts/weight of food/ other items of want. But even then problems occur, for not everyone's foot is a "foot/12 inches".
The real point of it is not really mathematical at all, it's math contradiction disproving the "discrete" nature of reality. Everything is con-substantial to another...which would explain why we use things to measure things
>I guess diagonals don't actually existOf course not, like other mathematical terminologies such as "numbers" and "point".
