/sci/ - Science & Math » Thread #13730061

83KiB, 646x536, Sagan_Quote.jpg

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Fri 08 Oct 20:28:04 2021 No.13730061 View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>13730114 >>13730283 >>13730491 >>13730492

Do most scientists pretend to be atheist because they think it will make other scientists take them seriously?

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 08 Oct 2021 20:34:14 No.13730073 Report

Quoted By: >>13730182 >>13730255 >>13730444 >>13730464 >>13730486

carl sagan didn't say that and when scientists say things like that they aren't talking about your fucking sky daddy making the earth and the heavens in 6 days
now make this thread again and get btfo again as you do every fucking day.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 08 Oct 2021 20:45:48 No.13730096 Report

Quoted By:

OP should use the first gulp from the glass to swallow his pills

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 08 Oct 2021 20:51:58 No.13730114 Report

Quoted By:

>>13730061
The fact that there are things that are potentially unknowable through materialist methods gives them anxiety, so they construct their world view around naive scientific realism. Talk to any scientist about idealism or philosophical theories and watch as the get irate and redirect the conversation

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 02.jpg, 46KiB, 491x625

Anonymous Fri 08 Oct 2021 21:19:50 No.13730182 Report

Quoted By:

>>13730073
>carl sagan didn't say that and when scientists say things like that they aren't talking about your fucking sky daddy making the earth and the heavens in 6 days
>now make this thread again and get btfo again as you do every fucking day.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 08 Oct 2021 21:45:25 No.13730255 Report

Quoted By:

>>13730073
>they aren't talking about your fucking sky daddy
Whose sky daddy? Who's talking about him?

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 08 Oct 2021 21:54:04 No.13730283 Report

Quoted By: >>13730466

>>13730061
We should post this to some christian group and see if they take it seriously lmao

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO dumbass.jpg, 53KiB, 600x480

Anonymous Fri 08 Oct 2021 22:42:54 No.13730444 Report

Quoted By:

>>13730073

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 08 Oct 2021 22:48:18 No.13730464 Report

Quoted By: >>13730482

>>13730073
Euler wrote some words on God
http://eulerarchive.maa.org/docs/translations/E092trans.pdf
But who cares, you're superior to him

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 08 Oct 2021 22:48:35 No.13730466 Report

Quoted By:

>>13730283
do it

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 08 Oct 2021 22:55:08 No.13730482 Report

Quoted By: >>13730487 >>13730496 >>13730512

>>13730464
since euler just botched proofs and most of the shit he predicted (because he didn’t prove them lol) had to be formalized by poor souls centuries after him, I would say “proving” the existence of a middle eastern desert mountain god is not something I would consider him able to do

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 08 Oct 2021 22:55:44 No.13730486 Report

Quoted By:

>>13730073
>he thinks god is a sky daddy

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 08 Oct 2021 22:56:18 No.13730487 Report

Quoted By: >>13730508

>>13730482
>euler just botched proofs
Typical atheist retard.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 08 Oct 2021 22:57:16 No.13730491 Report

Quoted By:

>>13730061
No one cares. I've never asked anyone what they believe and they've never asked me what I believed.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO Lol_atheism.jpg, 35KiB, 496x400

Anonymous Fri 08 Oct 2021 22:57:21 No.13730492 Report

Quoted By:

>>13730061
Yes, but also because they were trained to think inside a very small box and not believe anything that wasn't discovered by their own institutions

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 08 Oct 2021 22:59:32 No.13730496 Report

Quoted By: >>13730508

>>13730482
That's as stupid as saying all proofs before the formulation of modern set theory were "botched" and "invalid".

Like other internet atheists, you are extremely idiotic and have no idea what you're talking about.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 08 Oct 2021 23:03:37 No.13730508 Report

Quoted By:

>>13730496
>>13730487
>before the formulation of modern set theory were "botched" and "invalid".
that’s a very correct statement, most shit used in the past was never formally proven and just seemed to work for all possible realistic cases, just like Riemann’s Hypothesis. maths before the 1960s is a big mess of speculations that seem to work and the only thing I will give early mathematicians credit for is intuition

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 08 Oct 2021 23:04:54 No.13730512 Report

Quoted By:

>>13730482
the absolute state of fedoras

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

Your latest searches