>>13726077I blame the media.
Scientists make hundreds of different climate change models every year, the media deliberately selects the most alarmist ones and presents them to the public as what will happen as opposed to what could happen. Then when normies see these alarmist predictions don't come true, they immediacy discount the idea of climate change despite the fact that there are observable trends that seem to follow more conservative models that still have poor long term outcomes.
tl;dr
Climate change is not as bad as the alarmists would have you think, but that still doesn't mean it's good. Secondly, anyone who says that there is no human component is stupid, meanwhile the people say that there is no natural environmental component are equally stupid. It's pretty clear to me that we're in a natural trend that's being accelerated by human activity, the reasonable point of debate isn't whether or not there is a human component, it's how significant the human component is and how effective changes we might make to slow or stop the trend might be.
