I absolutely hate modern gender theory and other stuff, but how does pol refute this?
It's basically saying that if gender is a state on a vector space V, then it can be deconstructed into pertinent operators with the male, female and non binary state on V. Some people also assert that gender can be considered an n-k dimensional vector space within itself, other genders being elements of the basis of that space with k dependent vectors. This is pretty political jannies, I just wanna gauge what an average poltard thinks about it cuz I absolutely loathe the idea of these abominable extra
It's basically saying that if gender is a state on a vector space V, then it can be deconstructed into pertinent operators with the male, female and non binary state on V. Some people also assert that gender can be considered an n-k dimensional vector space within itself, other genders being elements of the basis of that space with k dependent vectors. This is pretty political jannies, I just wanna gauge what an average poltard thinks about it cuz I absolutely loathe the idea of these abominable extra