>>13716173>Not that guy, but how is it incompatible?The CI says properties, such as spin, don't actually exist until the property is called into existence by being measured.
A pair of entangled photons are created, and yet (supposedly) neither has spin until one of them encounters (let's say) a magnetic field, thus revealing/causing(?) its spin to exist.
Since we know they have complementary (opposite) spins, we now have advance knowledge of what they other particle's spin must be, even if that spin won't actually manifest until it also runs into a magnetic field, thus revealing/manifesting a spin we can predict by having observed the other particle.
This is actually weirder than "spooky action at a distance" because it's also "spooky action" over time.
What if one photon travels ten meters before reaching a spin detector, while the other is headed for deep space, and won't have it's spin revealed/manifested for years, maybe?
