>>13713623>me>data scientist>I would rate myself a 5/10 programmer>not great, but I know bad code when I see it, and I usually can tell if something I wrote is bad>inherit project to work on for a year>two teams have previously worked on it>its all written in jupyter notebooks>absolute filepaths galore>constants not named, just left as magic numbers>70% of the lines in each method are repeated code>notebook wont even run without throwing errors because they wrote code that put necessary variables into memory, then deleted the code that made them>no such thing as method or file docstrings, only inline comments>comments aren't even good at explaining what is happening>single letter or uninformative variable names>someone even implemented their own max functionData """""scientists""""" write the worst code.