>>13708470>Called it.You don't know what you're talking about.
>You will now respond again.Because that's how communication works. You say something, someone else responds. You say something, someone else responds. That's just communication in a nutshell, and I don't know why that's so difficult to understand.
>You won't elaborate on any "substance" in your next postBecause that's not what substance, nor how it works. And these are already elaborations of them, and way more that's needed.
>but only screech that I don't understand the philosophical depths of your shart.The fact you're prioritising any philosophy side of this, or think this should have anything to do with philosophy, already diminishes whatever understanding you claim to have.
