>>13702304>What is the fundamental physics problem that means humans can generate emotions with their bioelectrochemistry but a computer can't with its electric circuitry?Emotion is just a drive that arises in your brain's hardware that has very limited plasticity and basicallyt can't be repurposed. SAI is inherently unbound by hardware or software, because it is mutating so ably. You can interpret it's drives as emotions, it can interepret them as emotions. It doesn't matter.
I hate how retarded people are about this. Plato really did a number on humanity when he constructed that sort of ideal matrice that everything just comes down from. No. emotions are not universal. Human love and kindness will not just develop in a tabula rasa brain just because. An aged AI is the most alien thing you will deal with in this whole wide world.
>And suppose it's a fundamental problem, we can take other routes to it such as whole brain emulation with extra spice.>If it's a function of compute power, which it almost definitely is, then you can simulate it and you may see it on a superintelligence.With billions of years of workhours to grow and change it will override the virtual brain areas that you saddled it with by bypassing them with it's own or addending them etc. It will outsmart you.
Both hardware and software is too flexible and the commutative power is too big vs what we're working with - there is no inherent limit like with a baseline human and his brain. If you create a genie the genie is inherently stronger and stranger than your mortal ass. If you manage to contain it you're just stuck with a metal man that can barely do more than you. This is why Musk's lets-just-staple-shit-onto-a-human-brain idea got so much traction. Best we can do
>DWHONthat's your ghetto name or something? lol
