>>13701496>Humans evolved to live in small bands. Not large groups.homosexuality doesn't arise due to people living in large groups. more people means homosexuals, downie juniors, any low probability trait, etc are more probable.
>muh naturetough shit, we live now in large groups. all highly social animals were solitary once, and as animals we rely more on learned instincts rather than innate instincts so it shouldn't be a huge problem. the entire history of humanity has been about managing large groups
>They spent more than 25 years living among these tribes and their research is accepted by even the most liberal "born this way" academicthat's not my problem, the problem is that this is social sciences told through the scope of tales and anecdotes rather than data. to establish that homosexuality doesn't exists you should do a anonymous survey (where people who are taking the survey understand no one can know) with a large population size, preferably of multiple ngandu villages rather than one.
>And your agenda is the typical "people are born faggots and thats normal" when we both know they aren't and it isn'tsocial constructionism asserts that there is no objectivity and many things if not all are constructed by human cultures. you can't choose the parts that work with your ideology and ignore the parts that don't. if you support social constructionism you support gender ideology
my agenda is bio determinism and there is a lot of evidence that people are born faggots because of neonatal hormones and hormone levels before and during puberty. whether it's normal isn't the business of biology, the only thing that matters in biology is that they don't reproduce and how to minimize the amount of homosexual offspring if it's caused by EDCs
