>>13698502>The physics landscape today isn't what it was back then.It is exactly the same lmao, can you name ONE important groundbreaking thing that is different from 20 years ago?
> Neutrino oscillations, Higgs boson discovered, quark-gluon plasma, b-tagging, W decayThings predicted like 20 to 70 years ago, nothing has change in the landscape today lmao, Ten years in the LHC has failed to deliver the exciting discoveries that scientists promised. With a $5 billion price tag and a $1 billion annual operation cost, the lhc is the most expensive instrument ever built and that's even though it reuses the tunnel of an earlier collider. Is a failure, nothing that you named did anything ground breaking to physics it didn't solve anything, and if you believe the higgs is ground breaking, the higgs only accounts for like less then 5% of the total mass of the entire universe, that's how miniscule the higgs is.
>LHC has done more for physics than you'll ever know.It has done Zero to physics, is the biggest waste of money and failure in all of physics, only retards like you who have no idea how worthless it is support it
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_Model#Challengeshttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_unsolved_problems_in_physics#High-energy_physics/particle_physics>why don't you look up the average time between a paper published and a Nobel prize awarded you fucking retard.The maldacena paper, a pro-string theory paper is the most cited published paper in all of high energy physics, so yeah don't bring published papers into the discussion since you like to talk about relevance so much.
