>>13688985I don't understand what you mean by that, nor do I understand what you mean with phrases like "systematic humility", or "the deeper philosophy of science questions and the fact of ineffability (we don't know everything, and know we don't)". When you use the big words, you have to remember to be coherent, else people mistake you for a fool.
The fact that a large portion of people misunderstand science as being subjective speaks to a failure in education.
Well educated people often repeat phrases like "Science tells us we should do this or that". But science does not and can not command, advise or suggest. It's devoid of all subjective value judgement of one thing being better or worse than any other.
Science is a method for falsifying truth claims, nothing more.
> "Rationalistic rhetoric about some day being able to fully control our experiences despite having no control over the environment."What the fuck are you talking about?
