>>13681224>For one, we can't even establish an exclusive and exhaustive scientific definition of God.We have a pretty good idea of what God, or a divine being, is: a being trascending natural laws, object of worship and meditation upon by humanity
That's what divinity has always been for the history of humanity
>For two, we have no idea what the universe might contain, so we can't be certain that anything definitely does not exist anywhere in the universe.Dumb argument.
First, I am fairly sure I wonh't find a marshmallow planet the atmosphere of which is unicorn farts anywhere in the universe.
Second, we at least have a pretty good idea where sentience, and life, come from, and what its limitations are, so the idea of a being who's almighty, all-knowing, living outside the bounds of space and time, and creating the whole universe is a bit difficult to reconcile
>some other universe in the multiverseThis is where I tell you to take your meds
>But I'm also not able to invest myself in a positive belief that God definitely does not exist. I'm not agnostic. Or I'm agnostic atheist. I don't believe. I don't know, and I don't believe.Belief is a logic gate: if you believe, you believe; if you require proof to believe or not believe, you don't believe
