>>13681047>so if i know how much energy something has it can be anywherethese are not mutually exclusive
>if i know where something is, it is deadsending a diffusely polarized lightsource through two slits with polarizers in them doesn't kill every photon, just the ones that are off axis to the polarizer. Copenhagen interpretation is just completely wrong in this regard and forcing identification of the photon origin in this way is actually changing the whole system. Double eraser makes this problem harder yes. But so far QM and QFT have been advancing just fine and we're on the cusp of mastering entanglement, quantum computing, and documenting all possible electron configurations. all without ever being able to measure an electron or photon directly, without destroying them