>>13680920>Many physicians had already been exposed and acquired natural immunity by the time vaccines were rolled out, as I previously noted.That's false since we've done everything to prevent exposition precisely to prevent losing control. Natural immunity can only happen if you have been contaminated and healthcare worker don't intend to catch what their patient have.
Beside the way vaccines works is by accelerating the process of acquiring immunity in much safer way than catching it naturally.
You are just confusing a wishful but false narrative with reality.
>What do you mean the vaccines 'work'?Before a significant fraction of the population could die/get severe covid19.
Now, almost only the significant fraction of the population who didn't get vaccinated can die/get severe covid19.
Even if you don't trust anyone over the efficacy of the vaccines, the result is visible.
>No one has demonstrated that hundreds of thousands of lives have been saved by the vaccines>Total covid deaths in the most vaccinated countries are similar to what they were at the same time last yearThat's false and you just have to look at any statistic from respectable news outlet.
The fact the hospital aren't saturated now despite the same spread before lockdown demonstrate that something changed, and what changed by all trustworthy sources is that large fraction of the population are vaccinated, especially the fragile one.
>>13680924>Ivermectin>live-savingIf it was, we would already be using it worldwide with proof. But since (despite loonies' beliefs) there is no conspiracy capable of preventing a working medicine to be known across every countries, the logical conclusion is that this Ivermectin is not actually working on covid and only pushed by anti-vaccs pundits or whatever idiot find a benefit in spreading fakenews.
>needless risk of vaccinationEssentially null compared to the risk of dying unvaccinated, the only winning move to decrease the risk is to get vaccinated.
