>>13679242Anywhere really, you could just have a diagonal bridge over the river, or go over the river with either of the roads and waste bit of the previous work when joining them.
>>13679296If we assume it wasn't intended to be like it is now, that then they probably were trying to do it like that but messed up somewhere along the line. It could just be that there was supposed to be a diagonal bridge there but they ran out of money or motivation for it.
>Maybe they realized that people would not be driving too fast there anywayIt's a 12 lane highway they obviously wanted people to drive fast, probably just realized that people don't actually have cars to warrant a 12 lane highway bridge.
>>13679293>I don't understand why there are two roads/bridges connecting in the first placeThey are sliproads to access the towns there, or alternatively they are the replacement solution when the money for the big bridge ran out but you still needed some kind of a solution to connect the 2 sides that were completed.
