>>13674513I see you are finally trying to address the central point. It is good that you are learning Anon, I am proud of you.
>EvolutionThe theory of Evolution holds and applies to systems such as accretion disk formulation. Evolution as the primary cause for life is largely disproven.
> don't give a fuck about darwinYou were so close, but slipped back into relying logical fallacies so quickly...
>MarsYou have the wrong paper. The paper I decided describes deterministics methods for early cell formulation from the energy minimization of lipid bubbles in thermal vents and provides paleontological evidence that this actually occured on earth; i.e. the creation of life is a deterministic process of energy minimization pointing to more than random chance.
>Intelligent DesignIs closer to scientific fact than Darwanian evolution since the process is by intentional design, further adaptions is driven by epigentic processes (similar to Lamarckian evolution but even more contorled); our ancestors developed thumbs because they needed them and this was stimulated over time and NOT by random mutations and evolutionary inherentance nor "survival of the fittest".
>>13674523You completely misunderstood the post midwit.
>>13674557>yes retard everything is a theoretical models,Yes, that's exactly my point. Since when does data regression on models require "belief"? How fucking retarded can you be? Science does not require belief. Modelling and theories have nothing to do with religion it is a completely different, emperical, induction based epistemology compared to religion/theology which is largely based on deductive reasoning and "belief".
>if you are choosing the christcuck or any [insert religion] "I believe in science" is a fucking retardedly uneducated statement, a mistake that educated Christians who can distinguish between different fields of study rarely make. Go back to r*ddit or just kys, just don't post on /sci/ ever again.
