Apparently dead wood releases around 10.9 gigatons of CO2 every year. Does that mean that the armchair climate scientists that say that humans are the largest contributor of CO2 we're pulling their claim out of their ass or is this new study in nature comparing insect contribution to dead wood composition just going to be a thing that's ignored?
Is the scientific community so wholly dependant on bunk models that we will literally see no advancement of science until a generation dies off and new ones are allowed to have different ideAs?
Is the scientific community so wholly dependant on bunk models that we will literally see no advancement of science until a generation dies off and new ones are allowed to have different ideAs?