/sci/ - Science & Math » Thread #13664012

75KiB, 960x952, CE1F09B8-2861-414A-A51A-53459C865BD2.jpg

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO

98% CANT SLOVE

Anonymous Mon 20 Sep 22:24:22 2021 No.13664012 View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>13664943 >>13664946 >>13666724 >>13667196 >>13668212 >>13670769

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 20 Sep 2021 22:43:01 No.13664110 Report

Quoted By:

give me the stats to prove that 98% of people can't

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 20 Sep 2021 22:49:55 No.13664144 Report

Quoted By:

very cool meme, thanks

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 21 Sep 2021 02:59:21 No.13664943 Report

Quoted By:

>>13664012
I can understand until the 7th line.
I still haven't taken enough commutative/homological algebra to understand the question.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 21 Sep 2021 03:00:21 No.13664946 Report

Quoted By:

>>13664012
>CANT SLOVE
nobody can SLOVE

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 21 Sep 2021 16:39:59 No.13666713 Report

Quoted By:

best thread on sci rn

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 21 Sep 2021 16:41:54 No.13666724 Report

Quoted By:

>>13664012
does this actually have any meaning

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 333.jpg, 23KiB, 1024x576

Anonymous Tue 21 Sep 2021 18:42:47 No.13667196 Report

Quoted By:

>>13664012

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 20210919_125011.jpg, 68KiB, 828x826

Anonymous Tue 21 Sep 2021 23:56:23 No.13668212 Report

Quoted By: >>13670751

>>13664012
I solved this a long time ago in an Instagram comment. The answer would be a polynomial ring, which is obtained by diving the polynomial field with a coefficient of 2.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 22 Sep 2021 14:04:13 No.13670174 Report

Quoted By:

H* is the ring of polynomials over *burger* with degree d <= n. This is directly copied from Theorem 3.12 of Hatcher - Algebraic Topology except with fruits because OP is a fruit ( homosexual ).

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 1605702920054.jpg, 58KiB, 1248x1151

Anonymous Wed 22 Sep 2021 16:48:49 No.13670696 Report

Quoted By: >>13670781 >>13670794

Why is this wrong???

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 22 Sep 2021 16:58:53 No.13670751 Report

Quoted By:

>>13668212
>Describe the answer in terms of a polynomial ring
>the answer would be a polynomial ring
wow great answer

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 1632176662808.jpg, 11KiB, 664x42

Anonymous Wed 22 Sep 2021 17:02:44 No.13670769 Report

Quoted By:

>>13664012
Answer is pic related.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 22 Sep 2021 17:05:49 No.13670781 Report

Quoted By:

>>13670696
The instructor's example is wrong. Rest is fine.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 22 Sep 2021 17:09:17 No.13670794 Report

Quoted By: >>13670816 >>13670879 >>13672210

>>13670696
If x approaches 5, the denominator will be approaching 0. If you divide finite number by 0, the answer will be infinity. Infinity sign looks like "8" sideways.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 22 Sep 2021 17:13:43 No.13670816 Report

Quoted By:

>>13670794
>If you divide finite number by 0, the answer will be infinity.
Anything divided by 0 is undefined. That is why the problem is for approaching 1/0 while not actually being it.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 22 Sep 2021 17:29:20 No.13670879 Report

Quoted By:

>>13670794
As far as hilariously wrong explanations go, this one is disappointingly lame.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 23 Sep 2021 00:40:58 No.13672210 Report

Quoted By:

>>13670794
>If you divide finite number by 0, the answer will be infinity.
-1 divided by infinity is negative infinity. you literally couldn't be more wrong in this case

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

Your latest searches