>>13663544Actually, let me rephrase it a bit:
What I'm trying to say is that the firmament of thought and action rests on the inexplicable, so a being possessing consciousness is to be regarded as an inexplicable phenomenon. However, if a being possessed of consciousness is to be regarded as an inexplicable phenomenon, then a being that has consciousness must exist. The same goes for a thing. That is to say, if a thing possessed of consciousness is to be regarded as an inexplicable phenomenon, then a being that has consciousness must exist, and so on. In short, it is not possible to deny that a thing that is possessed of consciousness exists. This, then, is my conclusion on the question of the existence of things that have consciousness.
Do you understand now?
