>So here is my stance on global warming: Complete fucking agnosticism!

This is a topic so politicized that I genuinely cannot trust any "data" or "proof" from either side to not be informed by an affiliation to those whole-sale packs of ideas called political ideologies. Everyone has an agenda. Even if you think that this personally doesn't apply to you, think of all the subroutines that spark in your subconscious (Assuming most people here perceive it as real). Pride in your intelligence, trust in "science" which is actually not the pure idea, but the crooked manifestation of that through current establishments and informed by today's cultural beliefs. Perhaps superiority over those silly people who have not discovered the church of our lord and savior "Science"? Informed by concepts like religion and politics/culture unlike you?

Now let me be clear. I'm not shitting on science. I'm just saying.. The scientific method should be looked upon over spans of time way grander than what a lifetime permits. The zeitgeist will inevitably corrupt each short-term manifestation, but hopefully long-term statistics will just do its work.

So if you read up to here, I have a question:
>How the fuck do I know what's real? Can you convince me one way or the other?