>>13662768For the last time, then I'l really stop replying
The fact the blind person doesn't see stuff it's not sayign anything about the quality of stuff, it's a defect in the blind person's perception
The blind person might not be able to tell a lightbulb emits light, due to his own ignorance; or he might be able to tell anyway because the lightbulb also emits heat, BTFOing half of your argument
A chair robbed of my own perception is still a chair, somewhere else. As I said, atoms and elements were still a thing, even when there was no living thing around to name and study them,even when matter itself had no structure beyond really fucking hot plasma
Or should I deny the existence of people living in China because, to me, they are less perceptible than the Moon?
The UV rays was just an example, of course they don't exist as "objects", they are fucking electromagnetic waves. Distant galaxies, then. Did they only start existing when we deployed the Hubble deep field telescope?
You are dumb, you are really dumb, and I suspect you are being argumentative on purpose
