>>13658872As a previous poster said they're both around the same IQ so if there is a difference it's only small and marginal.
However I have something to say to the difference between styles of learning IMO.
Math is more towards strict logical thinking. You have some objects, you know them very well and you deduce from them with hard reasoning. There is little room for non logical reasoning generally speaking and you have to back your statements up with proof that theoretically no one should be able to disagree with
Physics however is a bit different, as physics is fundamentally an empirical science not a formal one, and hence the strict logical requirement from maths is no longer necessary here. This means lots of physics reasoning is based on intuition and models of various types where seemingly unlogical things (in the math sense) are accepted as long as it produces a good model. However physicists also need lots of skills so (as least as fa as I know in undergrad) they tend to need to learn lots of skills quickly while math folk tend to stay in their own lane and learn things in depth in a logical manner
ultimately they're different subjects but I feel like math strength is systematic logical reasoning while physics is doing whatever you can to make things work and learning a lot in a short time
